Maynard Cooper & Gale

The Part 107 regulations do not permit operations over restricted airspace or beyond the visual line of sight of the remote operator piloting the sUAV. The main rationale for these restrictions is an underlying safety concern. Some companies have succeeded in obtaining exceptions to these restrictions, after providing evidence of appropriate safeguards. On balance, the Part 107 regulations have propelled the commercial drone industry forward. For example, new business models have been created around the use of small drones for aerial photography such as, inspecting cell towers, railway lines, and commercial real estate. More sophisticated business models have emerged around the use of drones in the agriculture, insurance, and cargo transport industries. These new businesses have generated more interest in the commercial use of larger drones.

While technology has been moving rapidly and regulations concerning the commercial operations of UAVs are in place, the relative nascence of a legal, regulatory, and public policy framework for commercial operations with large UAVs presents challenges for the development of the personal aerial vehicle market. In late 2016, the FAA issued Part 23 regulations that provide a framework for vehicle certification of large UAVs (and other small aircraft with electric or hybrid propulsion systems). These regulations provide a pathway for a vehicle manufacturer to obtain an airworthiness certificate for a large UAV provided it meets the FAA’s vehicle performance requirements. While the exact nature of any unanswered questions can only be determined after a vehicle undergoes an evaluation process under Part 23, these Part 23 regulations are significant because it shows the many companies developing large UAVs or PAVs that there is a pathway to vehicle certification.

There remain several significant challenges to the wide scale use of PAVs. First, the infrastructure and operational framework that would permit the use of large UAVs for personal transport is not yet in existence. Although the air traffic infrastructure to integrate large UAVs into the national airspace in a scalable way has been the subject of a NASA project, it is still a work in progress. It’s clear that in order for a scalable use of large UAVs for passenger transport, flight operations beyond the visual line of sight and overcrowded urban areas will eventually have to be permitted.

In terms of physical infrastructure, vertiports allowing large UAVs take off and land in urban areas, along with charging stations for the batteries and passenger or cargo loading and unloading facilities are needed in order for personal aerial vehicles to be commercially feasible. Developing these necessary underlying systems in the U.S. will require coordination between the developing PAV industry, the FAA and various state and local interests to insure that safety issues, as well as the public interest in noise abatement and similar nuisance concerns, are addressed.

The final challenge to the introduction of PAVs relates to consumers and resonates with the concerns being raised about self-driving cars. It will doubtless take time and experience for the ordinary person to feel comfortable about getting in a pilotless air taxi at the top of a downtown office building and flying to the nearest airport. But make it affordable, reliable, and safe and the future could be now.